home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: nntp.teleport.com!sschaem
- From: sschaem@teleport.com (Stephan Schaem)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
- Subject: Re: New C2P
- Date: 15 Jan 1996 16:14:17 GMT
- Organization: Teleport - Portland's Public Access (503) 220-1016
- Message-ID: <4ddugp$ren@maureen.teleport.com>
- References: <4ctiib$2ok@irz305.inf.tu-dresden.de> <38231962@kone.fipnet.fi> <9601111903.AA0041d@dookie.demon.co.uk> <4d5m8o$f38@brachio.zrz.TU-Berlin.DE> <9601141632.AA00423@dookie.demon.co.uk>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: kelly.teleport.com
- X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
-
- Jonathan Belson (jon@dookie.demon.co.uk) wrote:
- : Philipp Boerker (rawneiha@w352zrz.zrz.TU-Berlin.DE) wrote:
-
- : : >: It is because of the instrction burst in the 68030 and upwards.
- : : >: They benefit of having the loop startpoint 16 bytes aligned.
- : :
- : : >For burst mode to make a difference in execution speed, you need static
- : : >column RAM, surely?
- : :
- : : No, you don't. Try your 030 with Instr Burst disabled...
-
- : I tried SysInfo with all combinations of IBurst and DBurst, no difference
- : at all.
-
- SysInfo... do sysinfo do cached and non cached test loops?
-
- Stephan
-